During the last sixty years, ordinary citizens of the western world have been subject to an almost continuous, public, outpouring of alarms, proclaiming forthcoming catastrophic events and predicting appalling outcomes. These ceaseless forebodings of disaster, given widespread publicity and, in many instances, supported by Government, have kept citizens in a state of anxiety and fear, robbing them of peace and security, and gradually inducing in them a disposition towards a particular response – just like the dogs in Russian scientist Ivan Pavlov’s research on conditioned reflex, published in 1927.
Each of these prophesyings has, in the event, been proved to be false, but their cumulative impact has resulted in a citizenry that has become amenable to manipulation by “authorities” through the use of fear.
This technique was foreshadowed in Alvin Toffler’s 1970 book, Future Shock, although his thesis was concerned with the pace of change in society, and the resultant fear, anxiety, confusion and dependence. But his analysis has been appropriated and given a more sinister application.
Here is a summary of some of the fraudulent fearmongering of the last seven decades.
1960s – “Hundreds of millions to starve in the seventies and eighties through starvation”. This was postulated by Paul Ehrlich in his 1968 book, The Population Bomb, and led to the adoption of Zero Population Growth (ZPG) as approved social policy, much like China’s One Child Policy, which came much later. The great starvation didn’t happen of course, but the consequence is that countries like Australia, who fell for the ZPG response, have to import workers from non-western nations, which have not succumbed to the “population bomb” scam.
In the 1970s it was the “coming ice age”, which was destined to be upon us, reducing food supplies and wiping out millions of people on the planet. An April 1975 article entitled “The Cooling World” in Newsweek magazine claimed that there were “ominous signs” that the world’s climate was cooling. The story said;
“The evidence in support of these predictions of global cooling has now begun to accumulate so massively that meteorologists are hard-pressed to keep up with it”. The article emphasized sensational and largely unsourced consequences – “resulting famines could be catastrophic”, “drought and desolation,” “the most devastating outbreak of tornadoes ever recorded”, “droughts, floods, extended dry spells, long freezes, delayed monsoons,” “impossible for starving peoples to migrate,” “the present decline has taken the planet about a sixth of the way toward the Ice Age”.
This didn’t happen either, and this doomsday scenario has a certain irony in the light of the more recent climate scam. However, it served its purpose at the time, which was to spread anxiety and insecurity as a mean of promoting dependence and submission.
The 1980s gave us the AIDS crisis, in which we were warned that the disease would inevitably break out into the heterosexual community and kill millions. Extraordinary sums were allocated by Government to research but, despite their best efforts, the disease stubbornly insisted on limiting itself, with very few exceptions, to homosexuals and drug addicts with whom they shared needles. However, the scare received such extraordinary media coverage and Government publicity that people’s reflexes were further enhanced in their conditioning to official scaremongering, hype and scam.
Acid rain was the catastrophe of choice in the 1990s, a horror story in which rainfall, polluted by industrial fallout, would result in the complete failure or poisoning of crops leading to starvation on a grand scale. Many industries took the hint end transferred their factories, and their jobs, to Asia, where the scam didn’t take hold. In the event however, Australia has seen vast increases in agricultural production, while industrial employment opportunities have disappeared.
Who can forget the year 2000, and the coming Y2K catastrophe, which envisaged planes falling from the sky, banks being unable to operate, power sources collapsing and anything requiring computers, such as retail, transport, phones etc. being unable to operate. This particular scam produced widespread paranoia, and many people began stocking food and essential supplies, including guns and ammunition against the dreadful day, 1st January 2000, when all computers were expected to collapse, according to the doomsday predictions of “experts”. No-one, evidently, bothered to advance their computer clocks to 11.55 p.m. 31st December 1999, to see what would happen.
2010 saw a ramping up of the hysteria with the emergence of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGWarm), which postulated a theory that the earth was heating up to a degree that would make the production of essential food impossible and life on the planet would therefore become extinct. Like all of the preceding campaigns of fear and loathing, this catastrophe too, was inevitable. “The science is settled!” we were told. The science, or at least the scientists, informed us that, on the one hand, cities would be inundated by rising sea levels up to the height of a ten story building, while, on the other hand, there would be no rainfall to irrigate crops. Another cry of “The end of the world is nigh!”.
All of these catastrophes have, of course, proved to be without foundation and some are completely inconsistent with each other. The Coming Ice Age didn’t eventuate in the 1970s so, forty years later, global warming was pulled out of the hat to continue the social manipulation and conditioning of the people. The extraordinary expenditure of Governments in response to this “catastrophe” has brought about bankrupt economies, destroyed industries and, importantly, accelerated widespread anxiety, confusion and despair, while, at the same time, promoting destructive divisions within our polity.
This fraudulent fearmongering of the last sixty years has resulted in a totally deceived, terrorised and brainwashed citizenry, which has fearfully, but eagerly surrendered its liberty into the hands of Government in response to the doomsday scenarios with which they have been bombarded. That was always the intention.
The 2020s however, have achieved what none of the other crises could, almost total control of the citizenry through the emergence of Covid 19, a humanly manufactured virus released into the world, creating such government induced panic and terror that national economies have been destroyed in endeavouring to suppress it.
The Great Reset
The Great Reset is an initiative of the World Economic Forum, an organisation established by Klaus Schwab in 1971. He describes it as the International Organisation for Public-Private Cooperation, the purpose of which is “to empower global leaders to shape the future for the better”. Since its inception, the WEF has gained credibility with elitists throughout the world and mounts annual conferences in Davos Switzerland. It claims to be a “trusted platform for all stakeholders of global society to integrate and aggregate their efforts to improve the state of the world”.
Its participants, or stakeholders, include governments, major international corporations, top ranking global research universities, the world’s leading media organisations, cultural leaders, trade unions etc. Over 1000 of the world’s most recognised leaders in their thirties are engaged as Young Global Leaders and almost 10,000 “outstanding young people in their twenties” contribute as Global Shapers, active in more than 400 cities around the world.
The WEF functions through high level personalised interaction of its participants and integration into digital and knowledge networks. It has become a fashionable organisation with which to be identified by international poseurs and “influencers”; for example, the United Nations, the Pope, the Prince of Wales, Greta Thunberg, George Clooney, Elton John, Leonardo Di Caprio, David Attenborough and more of the “usual suspects”. It is an important institution to which the international chattering class is deeply attached. It offers a wonderful stage for aggrandisement, forums and conferences for posturing before an international audience and significant international media exposure.
Essentially, the WEF is a global fascist organisation that seeks to reset the world’s governmental and economic systems so that they are organised and managed at the behest of, and for the benefit of, a group of international elites. There is no provision for the citizens of the world to be given the opportunity of considering whether such a model is what they want for themselves or their country; indeed, the notion of country, or the nation state, is to disappear and be merged into just one international governmental vehicle for the entire world.
The “Great Reset”, which is the name given to the fundamental objective of the WEF, has as its present agenda, “the future state of global relations, the direction of national economies, the priorities of societies, the nature of business models and the management of a global commons” (or One World Government). It envisages a controlled international economic system with all of the world’s citizens taking part at the level assigned to them. Individual enterprise will disappear and large multinational corporations will operate and control all business activity, which will be in the hands of a very few elites.
There is, of course, nothing new about these fantastic plans and purposes; this was once how the world functioned before the advent of democracy, but it ignores the fact that it was individual liberty that grew economies and improved living standards and rescued society from the stultified lifelessness and inefficiency of an economic system where the workers producing the wealth were, in effect, slaves. Probably, the most important factor leading to the defeat of Germany in World War 2 was that its economy was based on industries using slavery. Klaus Schwab, being German, seems to have overlooked that.
The WEF claims that the Covid 19 “crisis” presents the ideal environment for launching the Great Reset. “The Covid 19 crisis, and the political, economic and social disruptions it has caused, is fundamentally changing the traditional context for decision making”. In other words, governmental responses to the Covid 19 virus, have created such a mess that “the traditional context for decision making” must be altered. The “traditional context for decision making” in Australia is that the people decide how, and by whom, they are to be governed. The Great Reset envisages this being discontinued and being replaced by a local outreach of an unelected international government directed by “experts”.
Given that the Great Reset is proposed as an essential reform to facilitate recovery from the Covid 19 “crisis”, let’s examine how this came about.
The Covid 19 coronavirus is a humanly manufactured virus that has its origin in viral research at Chapel Hill laboratory in North Carolina. Further research was banned during the Obama Administration, and the US research authorities funded the Wuhan Institute of Virology to carry on with “gain of function” research. This term, “gain of function”, essentially means to expand the functionality of a virus that was relatively benign to humans, so that it would become a biological weapon of mass destruction.
The Chinese, with US Government funding authorised by Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the US National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, continued this “gain of function” research. The enhanced virus found its way out of the laboratory, whether by accident or design cannot yet be determined, and into the world, quickly resulting in a pandemic.
The response of governments to the pandemic made everything worse.
Government promoted panic spread terror amongst citizens around the globe and, as a consequence, has created an environment in which governments have been able to introduce policies that are rapidly reducing citizens to slavery status. Freedoms of assembly and movement have been revoked, while corporate media and communication monopolies increase their suppression of freedom of speech.
Concurrently, government employees have continued to be paid, whether working or not, while small private enterprise has been destroyed and citizens have become conditioned to be provided with the means of existence by Government handouts.
The economies of the world are rapidly falling into the hands of an international cabal of fascist elites, that controls media, pharmaceuticals, technology and government, and which has orchestrated this “Great Reset”, the intention of which is the reduction of overall population in the world, the integration of the world’s economies, the establishment of one world government, the development of a human species of “supermen” and the evolution of humanity into a structured society made up of supermen and slaves – or aristos and helots, or patricians and plebeians.
Having terrorised the world into irrational and hysterical fear, the next response has been to introduce a compulsory programme of vaccination with a vaccine that uses aborted baby components, interferes with the host DNA, is suspected to promote infertility, Parkinson’s disease and cancer, and probably conditions recipients to be more acquiescent to slavery status. The vaccines themselves are experimental and dangerous, and have little real impact on preventing the spread of the virus. The negative impacts of the vaccine have been suppressed by media and governments, as has information about proven appropriate and safe treatments for Covid 19, such as Ivermectin and hydroxychloride. This is all done to facilitate the establishment of the “Great Reset”.
The “Great Reset” is here; it has been coming for a generation and it has now arrived.
Ex British PM Gordon Brown, a former member of the Bilderberg Group, and now UN Special Envoy for Global Education, has called for the creation of a one world Government as the only way to deal successfully with the consequences of the Coronavirus crisis.
This ignores the fact that the principal negative consequence is the economic catastrophe caused by the response of Governments and international agencies, such as the WHO. Some of these responses are Orwellian in character and point to a future that parallels the dystopian world of “1984”.
In a 2016 interview with Swiss broadcasting group RTS, Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum (WEF), called for microchips to be implanted “in our brains”. Schwab, who leads the WEF’s “Great Reset” program, said that brain chips would be widely introduced “certainly in the next ten years”.
“At first we will implant them in our clothes,” he said. “And then we could imagine that we will implant them in our brains, or in our skin. And in the end, maybe, there will be a direct communication between our brains and the digital world. What we see is a kind of fusion of the physical, digital, and biological world”.
Welcome to the Brave New World!